On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Daniel Veillard <veill...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Felix, > Hi Daniel, > (the funny thing is that > they are now considered too CPU hungry, what a surprize :-) > Yeah, the quality of the protocols is worth a discussion itself ; ). > Please try to come with a patch, I can't 100% guarantee that i will > take it but but I promise to review it :-) Make sure 'make check' still > passes and that there is no regression in testlimits ! > Ok, I'll give it a try and let you know if I come up with something. > > > Anyway, thank you so much for libxml2! > > My pleasure, but i have far less time for it those days ! > Maintaining a few (much smaller) OS project myself, I completey understand. Thanks for giving me some initial feedback on this! Cheers, -- Felix Geisendörfer (felixge.de) Co-Founder, Debuggable Limited (debuggable.com <http://www.debuggable.com>) Mobile: +49 (151) 14967823
_______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ xml@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
