The nVidia cards work fine too. On top of this, I personally think the linux
support of nVidia is far better than ATI...

Just my 2 cents :-)
Regards Harry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Sprague [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 9:52 AM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      Re: [XFree86] Dual-head video card recommendations sought
> 
> I'd try looking at some of the more recent ATi cards
> (Radeon 8xxx or 9xxx) - they can do both VGA and DVI,
> and can, to the best of my knowledge, drive a TFT (via
> DVI or VGA) at better than 1600x1200. Different
> resolutions on different heads are possible, AFAIK,
> but different color depths isn't. (AFAIK, this is an
> XFree86 limitation). The catch is, to get full support
> (including the multihead stuff) you'll need ATi's
> driver. On the bright side, the fglrx driver seems
> very stable (I've been using it for quite a while,
> never an issue, with a Radeon 9700 Pro.)
> 
> 
> --- Nik Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [ not on the list -- cc'd replies would be
> > appreciated (but not
> >   essential, since I can cut/paste from the web
> > archives...) ]
> > 
> > On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Andrew Aitchison wrote:
> > > > Can someone recommend any video cards that fit
> > the following criteria:
> > > > 
> > > >   * Has dual-head support
> > > >   * Can run each head at different resolutions /
> > depths (1 head at
> > > >     1600x1200, 1 head at 1280x1024)
> > > >   * Supports mixed analogue / DVI output (1 head
> > analogue, 1 head DVI)
> > > >   * Works with XFree86 (obviously)
> > > > 
> > > > I'm planning on obtaining a TFT screen, and
> > running it alongside my
> > > > existing CRT, hence these requirements.
> > > 
> > > The Matrox G550 does all this.
> > 
> > Right.  I've done some research on this, and it
> > turns out that it has (I
> > think) a problem I hadn't anticipated (which is why
> > it's not in the list
> > of requirements above).
> > 
> > If I understand
> >
> http://www.matrox.com/mga/products/tech_info/g550_factsheet.cfm
> > properly, the bit of the "2D & display features"
> > section that says:
> > 
> > ---
> > Max resolution (primary RGB monitor or analog flat
> > panel) 2048x1536 @ 32bpp
> > 
> > Max resolution (secondary RGB monitor, analog flat
> > panel or TV) 1600x1200 @ 32bpp
> > 
> > Max resolution (primary + secondary digital flat
> > panel) 1280x1024 @ 32bpp
> > ---
> > 
> > means that I'll only be able to run the TFT at
> > 1280x1024.  Since the
> > TFT I've got my eye on as a native resolution of
> > 1600x1200, this would
> > be a bit of a waste.
> > 
> > N
> > -- 
> > FreeBSD: The Power to Serve     
> > http://www.freebsd.org/               (__)
> > FreeBSD Documentation Project   
> > http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/    \\\'',)
> >                                                     
> >                  \/  \ ^
> >    --- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F  94B7 93A8 0764 2C37
> > E375 ---         .\._/_)
> > 
> 
> > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature 
> 
> Geez
> _______________________________________________
> XFree86 mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
_______________________________________________
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86

Reply via email to