Ah, right.
This looks like cross-engine work, which mainly happens in the TL repo.
It will need to be ported back to the SourceForge repo at some stage I
guess.
Personally, I'd just use the TL repo and leave that sort of admin to
Karl or the people with write access on the SourceForge repo.
Joseph
On 13/12/2022 11:18, Tuff Contender wrote:
Ummm stupid of me. The correct url is
https://www.tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Build/source/texk/web2c/xetexdir/xetex.ch?r1=55885&r2=57724
, a commit on 2021-02-13.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 7:06 PM Joseph Wright <
joseph.wri...@morningstar2.co.uk> wrote:
On 13/12/2022 11:03, Tuff Contender wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 6:22 PM Joseph Wright <
joseph.wri...@morningstar2.co.uk> wrote:
On 09/12/2022 19:07, Tuff Contender wrote:
On 08/12/2022 09:22, Tuff Contender wrote:
The code on XeTeX - Unicode-based TeX / Code / [bc89c7] (
sourceforge.net)
<https://sourceforge.net/p/xetex/code/ci/master/tree/> seems not up
to
date, since the last modification is on 2020-01-20.
[image: image.png]
Where should I submit a merge request to?
What makes you think it's not up-to-date? (Other than some TL version
strings, I imagine this is the same code as in TL, etc.) That said,
I'd
likely look to send a patch in the first instance to TL, as it tends
to
be the place that any changes actually happen.
I viewed the page https://sourceforge.net/p/xetex/code/ci/master/tree/
and found the last change is on 2020-01-20, here's the snapshot
https://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20221208/db8bad7f/attachment-0001.png
Sure: I only meant that as far as I know, there have been no changes in
XeTeX since them. I was wondering why you thought there might be.
Joseph
Sorry for not getting the idea.
The last significant commit in `xetex.ch` is
https://www.tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Build/source/texk/web2c/tex.ch?r1=63916&r2=64547
on 2022-09-29, which is much later than the one on sf.
That's tex.ch, not xetex?
Joseph
