Hi Bruno,

when I test it with the Amiri font I get the same result, and Amiri contains a 
glyph for the ^^^^200d character.

(I would have prepared a minimal plain TeX example with Amiri but I don't know 
neither how to load an OpenType font
in plain TeX nor how to change writing direction)

> Le 25 mars 2021 à 10:58, Bruno Le Floch <blfla...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> Hello Yannis,
> 
> On 3/25/21 10:41 AM, Yannis Haralambous wrote:
>> This is XeTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-0.999993 (TeX Live 2021) (preloaded
>> format=plain)
>>  restricted \write18 enabled.
>> (./test.tex
>> Underfull \hbox (badness 10000) in paragraph at lines 6--6
>> *[] \tenrm blabla*
>> [1] )
>> (see the transcript file for additional information)
>> Output written on test.xdv (1 page, 236 bytes).
>> Transcript written on test.log.
>> 
>> which means that the pattern has not been applied.
> 
> When running essentially your code, I get a missing character message.  So the
> issue here is simply that the box ends up reading "blabla", so the patterns
> involving ^^^^200D are not relevant.  Naively I would expect the pattern to 
> work
> correctly if your font has this character.
> 
> Missing character: There is no ‍<U+200D> in font cmr10!
> 
> Best regards,
> Bruno

 <http://www.imt-atlantique.fr/>        Yannis HARALAMBOUS
Professor
Computer Science Department
UMR CNRS 6285 Lab-STICC
 <http://perso.telecom-bretagne.eu/yannisharalambous/> 
<https://twitter.com/y_haralambous> 
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/yannis-haralambous-5529073?trk=hp-identity-name>Technopôle
 Brest-Iroise CS 83818
29238 Brest Cedex 3, France
Une école de l'IMT <http://www.imt.fr/>
...il n'était pas loin de se comparer à celui qui,
jadis, avait donné le feu aux humains et auquel d'ailleurs
il trouverait un jour un nom, il se le promettait.     (Pierre Davy)



Reply via email to