Yes, but it did not explain why 12% is wrong. Zdeněk Wagner http://ttsm.icpf.cas.cz/team/wagner.shtml http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz
pá 13. 11. 2020 v 21:49 odesílatel Dominik Wujastyk <wujas...@gmail.com> napsal: > > Didn't we solve this with David's alternative suggestion of using \edef? > > https://cikitsa.blogspot.com/2010/09/xelatex-velthuis-encoding-and-palatal.html > > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 03:46, Zdenek Wagner <zdenek.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Just to add, 12% is definitely wrong because it does not end the >> number, the number ends at a non-number. If you type >> \catcode`\~=12% >> 3 sons >> >> you will get an error that 123 is not allowed here. You should end it >> either with a space or with a \relax. >> >> Zdeněk Wagner >> http://ttsm.icpf.cas.cz/team/wagner.shtml >> http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz >> >> čt 12. 11. 2020 v 11:36 odesílatel David Carlisle >> <d.p.carli...@gmail.com> napsal: >> > >> > >> > > \catcode`\~=12% >> > >> > changing catcodes in an environment looks wrong (the % after the 12 is >> > definitely wrong) if you change catcodes then the definition cannot work >> > in the argument of any command (for the same reasons that \verb does not >> > work in command arguments) . Leave ~ active but make it expand to the >> > inactive one eg >> > >> > \edef~{\string~}% >> > >> > >>
