Can you provide a bit more detail? Maybe a small example document?

Alan


Benct Philip Jonsson wrote:
I have a somewhat unusual problem. In a document produced using XeLaTeX I need to use four Unicode letters with scarce font support in italicized words and passages but the font which I have to use supports these characters only in roman. The obvious solution is to use the FakeSlant feature of fontspec but I don’t want to enclose these characters in a command argument, in the hope that a future version of the document can use an italic font which supports these characters, but neither do I (perhaps needless to say) want to use fake italics except for these four characters. In other words I would like to perform some kind of “keyhole surgery” in the preamble and use these characters normally in the body of the document, which I guess means having to make them active and somehow detect when they are inside the argument of `\textit`. (Note: it is appropriate to use `\textit` rather than `\emph` here because the purpose of the italicization is to mark text as being in an object language in a linguistic text.) Is that at all possible? I guess I could wrap `\textit` in a macro which locally redefines the active characters, but I’m not sure how to do that, nor how to access the glyphs corresponding to the characters once the characters are active. I am a user who isn’t afraid of using and making the most of various packages or of writing an occasional custom command to wrap up some repeatedly needed operation, but I am no expert. I am aware of all the arguments against fake italics — that is why I want to limit the damage as much as possible! — but I have no choice here. Waiting for the/an appropriate font to include italic versions of these characters is not an option at the moment.

/Benct



--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
 http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex



--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
 http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Reply via email to