I think that historically what you say about print is true... but I produce 
many many PDFs (syllabi, documentation, slide presentations) and for all 
intents and purposes non of them go to print anymore; simpler and cheaper to 
view on screen.

Still interested in the answer though!

Karljürgen 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 16, 2018, at 1:29 PM, Philip Taylor <p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> May I ask whether XeTeX is still being "actively" ( or even passively) 
> developed ?  I ask because, once again, I came up against a fundamental 
> limitation of XeTeX yesterday — the fact that a font can be defined to be of 
> a specific colour, but the colour model is restricted to RGB.  Given that 
> (IMHO), the vast majority of XeTeX output is intended for print rather than 
> for on-screen display, would it be possible to add support for additional 
> colour models (and specifically for CMYK) in a future instantiation of the 
> \font primitive ?
> -- 
> <Signature>
> Philip Taylor
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
>  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex




--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Reply via email to