On 18 January 2016 at 15:58, David J. Perry <hospes.pri...@verizon.net> wrote:
> I assume you have already considered: are the fonts embedded in the PDF? > Did he enter the characters as precomposed combinations or by using > combining marks? First option more likely, I imagine. > > Precomposed chars for text entry, and yes, the fonts are embedded. They're all CM fonts. This is a real shot in the dark, but here goes: > Is it possible that, at some point in the process, the precomposed > characters were decomposed and then put back together in a way that > affected the output? If the font in use contains precomposed combinations > but does not support positioning of combining marks this might happen. ??? > I guess I can try putting \XeTeXinputnormalization=1 \tracinglostchars=1 \tracingonline=1 into the preliminaries. I just got the TeX files a few hours ago, so when I have time, I'll have a look at the code, and see whether processing on my machine makes any difference. Meanwhile, I'm at home now, and I've just printed out that page kkk.pdf that I sent around, and it works just fine on my Epson WF-3640. The HP printer/driver is looking more and more guilty. Dominik
-------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
