I have no time to look deep into it but does anybody know what is the definition of \- if these packages is used? Isn't is possible that it is a fragile macro? I remember one thing from Phil Taylor's tutorial held on EuroTeX'92 in Prague. He said that the most frequent error is wrong timing of expansion. Is it possible that \- is redefined in such a way that it disappears somewhere during expansion of \footnote before t is typeset?
Zdeněk Wagner http://ttsm.icpf.cas.cz/team/wagner.shtml http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz 2015-10-07 20:54 GMT+02:00 Philip Taylor <p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk>: > > > Peter Mukunda Pasedach wrote: > > > You then get "hyphen-ateme", which is not among the list of possible > > hyphenation points I've specified. > > Yes, I realised that after I had posted, which confused me enormously. > The presence of explicit discretionaries within a word is supposed to > inhibit normal word-breaking, so I have no idea what is going on ... > > Philip Taylor > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex >
-------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
