On 7/31/15 4:45 PM, Akira Kakuto wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for this suggestion. Unfortunately, utf simply
prints the text as it finds it, so the first part of my
file (see below) appears as
I intended to use \textarabic usually, and to use \textarabic[utf]
when it is necessary.
Best,
Akira
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Yes, this would work if I were writing the file from scratch, but I am
working with long files that already involve many hundreds of switches
between types of input.
Also, in principle, if this is being done by TECkit, I'm not sure it is
desirable behavior. Since TECkit is for transforming legacy data into
unicode, I don't think it should be meddling with something that is
already in unicode.
Finally, if it is decided that this is the right behavior for
TECkit/arabxetex, I'm not sure it is being applied consistently. For
example, why are all short vowels and tanwin being stripped out in
novoc, but not sukun?
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex