David Carlisle wrote:
> I don't think that's the right question. Even if everyone, including > the Unicode technical committee, agreed some properties are > incorrect for some characters, it isn't clear we should change them > at this level. You are (inadvertently) conflating my question with earlier discussions. My question was asked solely in the context of Apostolos's suggestion that : > somewhere it is explained why this is not correct. Otherwise, people > would see strange things and might wonder why they see them. and I was trying to ascertain how best this explanation might be cast. If it is the case (that for UNIV) all agree that Unicode is wrong and Apostolos is correct, then a simple explanation that 'Unicode is wrong' would be all that is needed. But if (say) 50% of UNIV agree that Unicode is correct, then the explanation would have to be cast bearing this in mind. ** Phil. -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
