2012/8/1 Keith J. Schultz <keithjschu...@web.de>: > Hi Zdenek, > > Am 01.08.2012 um 13:22 schrieb Zdenek Wagner <zdenek.wag...@gmail.com>: > >> 2012/8/1 Ulrike Fischer <ne...@nililand.de>: >>> Am Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:30:52 +0200 schrieb Zdenek Wagner: >>> >>> Well you only confirm my impression: That quite a lot of scripts >>> never felt the pressure put on us by the movable type printing. >>> Western glyphs used in prints were greatly influenced by the >>> technical possibilities and were adapted to what was possible. For >>> me the idea that a printed document should look like "handwritten" >>> is curious. >>> >> I do not state that it should look as handwritten but at least the >> glyohs should have correct order and shape that is not too much >> different (even in handwriting Devanagari has variants). With the >> current version of luatex the correct order of glyphs cannot be >> acheved. If I copy&past a text from Hindi Wikipedia and typeset it in >> XeTeX, the result will be OK. If I do the same in luatex, the result >> will be garbage. > Why, because the language script is not support in LuaTeX!! > That's what I have already written. For people depending on such scripts and languages switching to luatex is no option today. > > -------------------------------------------------- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
-- Zdeněk Wagner http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/wagner/ http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
