Adam Twardoch (List) wrote:

* Even with the same core set of commands, if using OpenType fonts, the
results between LuaTeX and XeTeX will necessarily vary. LuaTeX and XeTeX
use different mechanisms when it comes to extracting glyph metrics,
kerning, other positioning commands, and also different mechanisms when
it comes to processing things like OpenType contextual alternates etc.
-- and by using different mechanisms, it by necessity arrives at results
that differ slightly.

No known OpenType Layout engine out there (Microsoft Uniscribe, Monotype
WorldType, Bitstream Panorama, Adobe World composer, ICU Layout,
HarfBuzz, Pango, or the LuaTeX engine) is 100% compatible with any
other, so the same line, or even word, may be typeset slightly
differently with each of those layout engines. This will, in the end,
necessarily result in different glyphs being used at times, different
line-breaking being generated etc. When it comes to Unicode and
OpenType, it's much more complex than the original 8-bit Western world,
and cross-platform compatibility is no longer a goal that can be
achieved at this time.

I'd say the situation is similar to the world of web browsers: HTML, CSS
and JavaScript are being actively developed, but some snapshots of the
development are strictly documented by the W3C, yet other factors come
into play so that a 100% pixel compatibility between Mozilla Firefox,
WebKit (Chrome or Safari), Microsoft Internet Explorer and Opera is not
achievable, and probably never will be.

OK, thank you Adam.  I think perhaps I was being unrealistic in
asking whether the two PDFs would be visually identical; for the
very reasons you adduce, it is clear that this can never be the
case.  But differences at the syntactic level are a far greater
concern : I think one should accept that if one passes an extant
XeTeX source through LuaTeX, line and page breaks may well differ,
but if LuaTeX barfs on valid XeTeX source, that is (for me, at
least) a far greater concern (and a reason against adoption, to
be honest).

** Phil.


--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
 http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Reply via email to