On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Peter Dyballa <peter_dyba...@web.de>wrote:
> > Am 16.07.2011 um 09:38 schrieb Michael Joyner: > > > As a sort of an aside (could tie into this) Is there a way to specify a > > "fallback" font for tetex to use when a glyph is not present in the > current > > active font? > > The results of finding in some other font the character would not satisfy > the user in every case. > I fail to understand the reasoning for this statement. How would being able to specify a fallback font when a glyph is missing be such a negative? I am sure you don't intend that NO GLYPH is better rather than allowing the end-user being able to specify at least a basic fallback set of glyphs? > > -- > Greetings > > Pete > > For some reason, this fortune reminds everyone of Marvin Zelkowitz. > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex > -- --- - Learn to speak Cherokee: http://www.cherokeelessons.com/ - Cherokee Language Help BBS/Chat: http://www.cherokeelessons.com/phpBB3/viewforum.php?f=6 - Cherokee Lessons PDF made with: http://www.lyx.org/
-------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
