2011/6/20 Tobias Schoel <liesdieda...@googlemail.com>: > Understood. Haven't thought about watches. Are months written with roman > numerals? Never seen that. (But I also don't understand, why the standard > YYYY/MM/DD resp. YYYY-MM-DD isn't.)
The standard is YYYYMMDD or YYYY-MM-DD (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iso8601#General_principles). As to why the month numbers are not roman nums: They don't sort easily and I doubt many east of Jerusalem understand them that well... Best Martin -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
