2010-11-01 13:53, Roland Kuhn skrev:
Generally, I recommend using the correct unicode characters in the TeX source and then define the behavior you want for them.
Yup, that's kind of the idea!
In this case, this is fairly straight-forward:
Yes. Since I didn't know about discretionaries I looked up the description of \discretionary at <http://www.tug.org/utilities/plain/cseq.html#discretionary-rp> But I ended up replacing Unicode characters with commands anyway. That the various Unicode hyphens don't look different in the TeXWorks editor is a real problem. The perl oneliners perl -pe's/(?<=\pL)\x{2011}(?=\pL)/\\\x{2013}/g' perl -pe's/(?<=\pL)\x{2027}(?=\pL)/\\\x{b7}/g' and defining \def\–{\hbox{-}} % \<en dash> = nobreak hyphen \def\·{·\discretionary{}{}{}} % Middle dot pretty much did the trick. Thanks! /bpj -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
