On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:06:38AM +0200, Roland Kuhn wrote: > With two different versions of the font the exact same behavior was seen when > switching from TL2007 or TL2008 to TL2010. This definitely rules out a font > issue. Furthermore, fontspec prints the specification in the log, and there > is nothing in there which would select alternates. This rules out fontspec as > the culprit.
Don't take what is printed in the log with great confidence, bugs exist. > I'm curious: why do you always request that people try luatex? Is XeTeX not > maintained anymore? I have no idea what luatex is, there simply was no need. > Is there a reason to change that? For this particular case, because two successive posts suggested a change in XeTeX behaviour which I highly doubt and since I don't have the font myself I can't but suggest what I think a strong way to rule out engines bugs; test with a different engine. I'm not asking anyone to switch to LuaTeX (though I consider this a desired out come), I'm only suggesting a step in debugging this particular case. Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
