Yes, I just realized that my example from the fontspec manual was not
exactly parallel to the situation I have. However, doing it as Gareth
suggests generates all sorts of nasty error messages.
I just tried specifying the bold etc. by font file names; no errors, but
no bold in the document either.
I'll study this more tomorrow when my brain is working better.
David
On 10/10/2010 11:19 PM, Andy Lin wrote:
Gareth is right; that is how you use BoldFont. Take a look at the
example from the fontspec manual again. It's using the HN-Regular as
the bold font because it's heavier than HN-Ultralight.
-Andy
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 23:05, David Perry<hospes.pri...@verizon.net> wrote:
2. Can anybody see what is wrong with the following?
\fontspec[BoldFont={Bergamo Std},ItalicFont={Bergamo
Std},BoldItalicFont={Bergamo Std}]{Cardo}
Yeah, you just declared the medium, upright font as bold and italic.
What you need is
\fontspec[BoldFont={Bergamo Std-Bold}, ItalicFont={Bergamo Std-Italic},
BoldItalicFont={Bergamo St-BoldItalic}]{Cardo}
I don't think so. See example 4 in the most recent fontspec manual, from
which I copied this:
\fontspec[BoldFont={Helvetica Neue}]{Helvetica Neue UltraLight}
which makes Helvetica Neue act as the "bold" for Helvetica Neue Ultralight.
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
