HI Mike, This problem is not "Tex" specific. It is not easy to get large amounts of information onto a single page or several. The problem is more of getting it in a form that is informative and precise without leaving something out. I agree that "TeX" has the advantage it is far easier to get automatically, generated information from diverse sources into a document formatted.
regards Keith. Am 03.10.2010 um 00:29 schrieb Mike Maxwell: > On 10/2/2010 3:52 PM, Paul Isambert wrote: >> And I'll add: printing a corpus with annotations that don't show up but >> are fed to LuaTeX for statistics, and returned as tables. What I'm doing >> right now. > > Interesting. We're producing grammars. They're XML (if you want to mark > structure, use XML!), and they get converted to XeLaTeX for typesetting (if > you want to typeset, use LaTeX!). One of the problems we've had is that of > deciding whether tables are too large to fit on a page, and must therefore be > printed with longtable instead of floating tables. We've also had a few > tables that are too wide, and need to be printed in landscape mode. > > When we first faced this problem a couple years ago, I was surprised to find > that there was no automatic way for LaTeX to detect the fact that a table was > too long or wide to fit on a page. Fortunately, it's possible to tag long or > wide tables in XML (DocBook), so the appropriate LaTeX table package is used. > But that seems a poor way to do things; when somebody might want to print > our grammar on a different size paper (A4, or maybe a book), they'll have to > check each table to see whether it's appearing correctly. > > Automatically produced tables--which I gather is what you're producing from > your corpus--might also suffer from that problem; I'm hoping you may have > come up with a solution. Or are they all short and narrow enough that you > know in advance that they'll fit? -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex