On 2010-10-04 11:57:27 +1030, "David J. Perry"
<hospes.pri...@verizon.net> said:
Ross and Will,
So the first question should be what is the version of XeTeX that MikTeX
is providing.
And is David actually using that, or still an earlier version, as I was on
a Mac.
If the primitive is not there, then the latest versions of expl3 and
fontspec just will not work, and may not even succeed in loading
successfully. Is that not correct?
As the person who raised the issue, I would like to help solve it.
Unfortunately, the problem developed on my machine upstate, where I was for
the weekend. I'm now back in the city to teach tomorrow morning, and my
machine here has not had the MiKTeX update that I applied this weekend. If
no one else sends in an example, I will certainly do so when I get back
upstate on Friday.
On further reflection, even confirming that the "not-updated" case
compiles correctly would be helpful. (As it would indicate
approximately when the error appeared.) Can you prepare the same
minimal example on your current setup?
Thanks,
Will
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
