> Guys! I have access to that font(DV-TTSurekh-Normal). It's not the one Mike used, he mentioned SD-TTSurekh. In fact, a Google search for DV-TTSurekh gives as first hit a link to download it, without any indication as to the legality of this.
But what you say probably applies to SD-TTSurekh as well: > As far as I know it is > said that font is made in 1996-97. And it in no way a Unicode OpenType Font. > It is an ASCII hack font for Devanagari. The Devanagari glyph are draw in > latin names. So, for example when you type a you will get क as glyph of a. According to http://fr.fontstock.net/11471/sd-ttsurekh-normal.html where you can see samples, the glyph for क is encoded at E, not a. But it's not at all Unicode-compliant anyway. > So just telling fontspec the font name will not work of that font as I know. Indeed no. Arthur -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
