On Sep 18, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Herbert Schulz wrote:
On Sep 18, 2010, at 2:01 PM, Dominik Wujastyk wrote:
Looking at the file xltxtra.sty that is current as of today in
TeXlive 2010
(version 2010/06/03 v0.5d) and grepping it for "Require", we find
that it
includes the following commands:
\RequirePackage{ifluatex}
\RequirePackage{fontspec}[2010/05/14 v2.0]
\RequirePackage{ifxetex}
\RequireXeTeX
\RequirePackage{fontspec}[2010/05/14 v2.0]
\RequirePackage{xunicode}
\RequirePackage{metalogo}
So yes, if you have a version of xltxtra.sty from June this year
onwards, it
does automatically load fontspec and xunicode if they aren't
already loaded.
Best,
Dominik
Dominik Wujastyk
On 18 September 2010 16:57, Herbert Schulz <he...@wideopenwest.com>
wrote:
Howdy,
Right now I'm loading xltxtra alone (since it loads xunicode and
fontspec).
In some of my older documents I am loading all three. With an
updated
fontspec (as of version ?) under xelatex which of the three
packages do I
need to be loading. Just trying to streamline my xelatex templates.
Good Luck,
Herb Schulz
(herbs at wideopenwest dot com)
Howdy,
I know about that, but I thought I read that at some point fontspec
will include what xltxtra has and, possibly, also include xunicode.
Then you would only use fontspec rather than xltxtra or some
combination of them.
I think most of xltxtra has been rolled into fontspec: here's a recent
message from Will on the subject. (Maybe that's what you recall
reading, Herb)
On 15/09/10 09:08, Will Robertson wrote:
Oh, don't worry, xltxtra will never go away -- but at this point in
time I'm no longer recommending that it needs to be used "by
default" by most users.
In time I'll merge \vfrac's functionality into the xfrac package, I
suspect. Until then continue to use xltxtra :)
W
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
