On Jul 14, 2010, at 9:45 AM, François Charette wrote: > The edition itself should indeed be searchable, indexable and the > accompanying apparatus should provide clear evidence for all changes the > editor(s) made to the original source(s). The photographic reproduction > should only complement the edition, which as a rule should not aim at > reproducing the paleographic peculiarities of the original sources from which > it was made. Even when a source exists in only one manuscript (or printed > book) reproduced in full (in print or in electronic form), I believe it is > advisable to provide a modern edition as well.
One of the coolest things ever was the Corbis CD-ROM _Leonardo_ w/ its unique ``Codescope'' viewer: http://www.atpm.com/4.06/page13.shtml So I could see using a font like this for something like that. William -- William Adams senior graphic designer Fry Communications Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow. -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
