On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 04:16:22PM +0200, ulrik.vi...@arcor.de wrote: > ---- Original Nachricht ---- > Von: wodzi...@math.berkeley.edu > An: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms <xetex@tug.org> > Datum: 17.06.2010 15:44 > Betreff: Re: [XeTeX] More info on segfaults in unicode-math on linux 64 bit > > > I did myself some testing today with TeXLive 2010 installed on 64-bit > > Fedora 13 using the experimental TeXLive 2010 repository for Fedora 13 > > which is maintained by Jind?ich Nový > > > > http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/ > > > > In my case, I report *no* segmentation faults when compiling XeLaTeX > > sources with lots of mathematics and unicode-math loaded with \setmathfont > > and \setmainfont directives in the preamble (I use \setmathfont with no > > potions and \setmainfont with options: 'Numbers=OldStyle,Mapping=tex-text' > > ; I did the testing with XITS fonts). > > I wonder if it might depend on which font is used: > > The orignal poster used "STIXGeneral" which is essentially a glyph container, > i.e. an OpenType font without a MATH table containing the positioning > information. > Maybe the segmentation fault was caused when XeTeX was trying to extract > the information from the MATH table and didn't find any such table.
I tested here, texlive-2009 with locally updated packages on a 32 bit linux, but I got no segmentation faults neither with "STIXGeneral" nor with any of the four other math fonts. -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
