Dear Sir,
I am using latex in windows environment. I have some problem . I am not able to
setup the following table in a A4 size paper
Please help me.
\begin{table}
\caption{Energy Contributions $(\triangle E_B)_{cm}, (\triangle E_B)_g, (\delta
M_B)_\chi$ and physical masses $(M_B)$ of ground
state baryons in MeV.}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline
% after \\: \hline or \cline{col1-col2} \cline{col3-col4} ...
{} &{} & {} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$(\triangle E_B)_g$} & {} &{}&
\multicolumn{1}{c}{$M_B$} \\
\cline{4-6} \cline{8-9}
Baryon & $E_B$ & $(\triangle E_B)_{cm}$ & $(\triangle E_B)^m_g$ & $(\triangle
E_B)^e_g$ & Total & $(\delta M_B)_\chi$ & Calculation & Expt.
\\\hline
N & 1507.335& -191.467 & -99.851 & 0 & -99.851 & -276.017 & 940 & 940 \\
\hline
$\triangle$ & 1507.335 & -191.467 & 99.851 & 0 & 99.851 &-183.719 & 1232 &
1232
\\ \hline
$\Lambda$ & 1622.074 & -192.833 & -99.851 & -46.769 &-146.62& -166.621 & 1116
& 1116
\\ \hline
$\sum$ & 1622.074 & -192.833 & -91.938 & -46.769 & -138.707 &-97.718 &
1192.816 & 1193
\\ \hline
$\sum^*$ & 1622.074 & -192.833 & 95.893 & -46.769 &49.124& -97.718 & 1380.647
& 1385
\\ \hline
$\Xi$ & 1736.812 & -193.996 & -90.312 & -46.769 & -137.081& -82.537 &
1323.198 & 1321
\\ \hline
$\Xi^*$ & 1736.812 & -193.996 & 97.516 & -46.769 & 50.747 & -82.537 &
1517.026 & 1533
\\ \hline
$\Omega^-$ & 1851.551 & -194.999 & 104.719 & 0 & 104.719& -79.139 & 1682.132
& 1672
\\ \hline
\end{tabular}
%\end{center}
\end{table}
ashok kumar khanda
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:27:07 +0530 wrote
>Send XeTeX mailing list submissions to
xetex@tug.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
xetex-requ...@tug.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
xetex-ow...@tug.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of XeTeX digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: bidi v1.1.0 (ali kalami)
2. xdvipdfmx and PDF/A requirements (Dino Petrucci)
3. Re: bidi v1.1.0 (Mehdi Omidali)
4. Fontspec and SBL Hebrew: Possible Bug? (David Purton)
5. Re: Fontspec and SBL Hebrew: Possible Bug? (Avi Wollman)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:02:27 +0430
From: ali kalami
To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] bidi v1.1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
???? ?? ???
?? ?? ?? ?? ??????? ???? ?? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ??? ?? ????? ?? ?????
???? ?????
???? ???
???? ?? ????? ????? ??????? ?? ??? ????? ??? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ?? ???? ???
?? ??? ?????? ??? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ???
???? ?????
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:37:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dino Petrucci
To: xetex@tug.org
Subject: [XeTeX] xdvipdfmx and PDF/A requirements
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8"
I was not able to find anything about xdvipdfmx and PDF/A. For me, there are
two problems, at least, I can't solve:
1. the driver doesn't create the /ID tag in the PDF trailer, which is
mandatory for PDF/A (this can't be done in a TeX document);
2. the driver always changes PDF Info's Producer (e.g. "xdvipdfmx (0.7.8)"),
but this is a problem with XMP schemas (that are built in a Xe[La]TeX document
and, therefore, should be independent of the driver version).
These problems have been solved in pdfTeX but not in (x)dvipdfmx, I think.
Thanks.
Dino Petrucci
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:14:58 +0430
From: Mehdi Omidali
To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] bidi v1.1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi,
Seems that you send this email to the wrong place (or person). The
default language of this list is english.
Mehdi
On 6/13/10, ali kalami wrote:
> ???? ?? ???
> ?? ?? ?? ?? ??????? ???? ?? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ??? ?? ????? ?? ?????
> ???? ?????
> ???? ???
> ???? ?? ????? ????? ??????? ?? ??? ????? ??? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ?? ???? ???
> ?? ??? ?????? ??? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ???
> ???? ?????
>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:51:50 +1000
From: David Purton
To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms
Subject: [XeTeX] Fontspec and SBL Hebrew: Possible Bug?
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi,
Just wondering if this is a possible bug:
I was looking through the SBL Hebrew manual
(http://www.sbl-site.org/Fonts/SBLHebrewUserManual1.5x.pdf) and noticed
that one of the tricky combinations mentioned in the manual is not
rendered correctly. The particular character in question is the alef on
page 7 of the manual. The SBL Hebrew font is available from
http://www.sbl-site.org/Fonts/SBL_Hbrw.ttf
No combinations I entered gave the correct rendering. Looking at the
font, it looks like there are some unmapped glyphs designed to cater for
this and similar cases. Initially I wondered if the ZWJ was a kludge,
but it does seem to appear in at least some copies of the WLC codex
online. Others use the same character ordering, but without the ZWJ.
My file versions:
This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.2 (TeX Live 2009/Debian)
xltxtra: 2009/09/02 v0.5
xunicode: 2008/02/08 v0.91
fontspec: 2008/08/09 v1.18
bidi: v1.1.1, , 2010/07/25
Minimal sample file showing various character orderings possible,
incuding the one with the ZWJ mentioned in the manual.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{xltxtra}
\usepackage{bidi}
\newfontfamily\hebrewfont[Script=Hebrew,Contextuals=Alternate,Ligatures=Required]{SBL
Hebrew}
\begin{document}
\hebrewfont\setRL
?????\quad % alef + hataf patah + ZWJ + meteg + dehi (From SBL Hebrew manual)
????\quad % alef + hataf patah + meteg + dehi
????\quad % alef + hataf patah + dehi + meteg
????\quad % alef + meteg + hataf patah + dehi
????\quad % alef + meteg + dehi + hataf patah
????\quad % alef + dehi + hataf patah + meteg
???? % alef + dehi + meteg + hataf + meteg
\end{document}
Questions:
Is there a fontspec option I am missing to enable correct rendering in
this case?
Can others confirm that this is a problem (in case some of my files are
too old)?
Any comments on how XeLaTeX/fontspec should behave? It would make sense
to me for at least the first two options in the minimal file above to
render correctly, since I do not understand why the ZWJ would be
necessary other than as a kludge... but I am very ignorant, so they may
be a good reason. Other parts of the SBL Hebrew manual talk about the
font being able to render correctly pointing and cantilation in any
order. However, I don't understand how and when normalisation should
occur.
cheers
David
--
David Purton
dcpur...@marshwiggle.net
For the eyes of the LORD range throughout the earth to
strengthen those whose hearts are fully committed to him.
2 Chronicles 16:9a
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:01:18 +0300
From: Avi Wollman
To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Fontspec and SBL Hebrew: Possible Bug?
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
looks okay by me.
miktex 2.8 (windows 7x64)
This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.1 (MiKTeX 2.8)
Avi
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 4:51 PM, David Purton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering if this is a possible bug:
>
> I was looking through the SBL Hebrew manual
> (http://www.sbl-site.org/Fonts/SBLHebrewUserManual1.5x.pdf) and noticed
> that one of the tricky combinations mentioned in the manual is not
> rendered correctly. The particular character in question is the alef on
> page 7 of the manual. The SBL Hebrew font is available from
> http://www.sbl-site.org/Fonts/SBL_Hbrw.ttf
>
> No combinations I entered gave the correct rendering. Looking at the
> font, it looks like there are some unmapped glyphs designed to cater for
> this and similar cases. Initially I wondered if the ZWJ was a kludge,
> but it does seem to appear in at least some copies of the WLC codex
> online. Others use the same character ordering, but without the ZWJ.
>
> My file versions:
>
> This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.2 (TeX Live 2009/Debian)
> xltxtra: 2009/09/02 v0.5
> xunicode: 2008/02/08 v0.91
> fontspec: 2008/08/09 v1.18
> bidi: v1.1.1, , 2010/07/25
>
>
> Minimal sample file showing various character orderings possible,
> incuding the one with the ZWJ mentioned in the manual.
>
>
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage{xltxtra}
> \usepackage{bidi}
> \newfontfamily\hebrewfont[Script=Hebrew,Contextuals=Alternate,Ligatures=Required]{SBL
> Hebrew}
> \begin{document}
> \hebrewfont\setRL
> ?????\quad % alef + hataf patah + ZWJ + meteg + dehi (From SBL Hebrew
> manual)
> ????\quad % alef + hataf patah + meteg + dehi
> ????\quad % alef + hataf patah + dehi + meteg
> ????\quad % alef + meteg + hataf patah + dehi
> ????\quad % alef + meteg + dehi + hataf patah
> ????\quad % alef + dehi + hataf patah + meteg
> ???? % alef + dehi + meteg + hataf + meteg
> \end{document}
>
>
> Questions:
>
> Is there a fontspec option I am missing to enable correct rendering in
> this case?
>
> Can others confirm that this is a problem (in case some of my files are
> too old)?
>
> Any comments on how XeLaTeX/fontspec should behave? It would make sense
> to me for at least the first two options in the minimal file above to
> render correctly, since I do not understand why the ZWJ would be
> necessary other than as a kludge... but I am very ignorant, so they may
> be a good reason. Other parts of the SBL Hebrew manual talk about the
> font being able to render correctly pointing and cantilation in any
> order. However, I don't understand how and when normalisation should
> occur.
>
>
> cheers
>
> David
>
> --
> David Purton
> dcpur...@marshwiggle.net
>
> For the eyes of the LORD range throughout the earth to
> strengthen those whose hearts are fully committed to him.
> 2 Chronicles 16:9a
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFMFOJ1FtfqMu4ICewRAmr4AKCUwPbSbJGCQ6bfwTYuMizr/4+1fwCfd2Nq
> 1k7Hnk0FlLXnwrU0vqt16sw=
> =2QFF
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Avi Wollman ??? ?????
http://www.google.com/profiles/avi.wollman
--------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 11968 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
XeTeX mailing list
XeTeX@tug.org
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
End of XeTeX Digest, Vol 75, Issue 34
*************************************
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
