On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:19:41PM +0200, Ulrik Vieth wrote: > On 06/06/2010 11:05 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote: > >>This usually means the value of RadicalRuleThikness is ignored and the > >>engine is falling back to the old TeX method (the hight of radical > >>glyph). > > Yes, but why? It doesn't seem to be font-dependent. > It also happens if I replace Cambria Math by XITS Math. > > Could this be an architecture / library-dependent? (Linux, 64 bit)
I don't think so, it is likely a macro package issue, but we need to do more bare bone testing (no luaotfload, no fontspec or unicode-math). Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
