On Tue, 11 May 2021, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:47:33AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > That's a much better plan. It is also not super urgent, so maybe for now > > we could add an explicit check for io_tlb_default_mem != NULL at the > > beginning of xen_swiotlb_init? So that at least we can fail explicitly > > or ignore it explicitly rather than by accident. > > Fine with me. Do you want to take over from here and test and submit > your version?
I can do that. Can I add your signed-off-by for your original fix?
