On 21.04.2021 11:31, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 19/04/2021 16:45, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 19.04.2021 16:01, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> As with the toolstack side, we ought to use -Og for debug builds. >>> >>> All fixes are trivial. The first 3 are understandable, given reduced >>> optimisations. The next 3 are, AFAICT, bogus diagnostics. >>> >>> Andrew Cooper (7): >>> xen/arm: Make make_cpus_node() compile at -Og >>> x86/shim: Fix compilation at -Og >>> x86/sysctl: Make arch_do_sysctl() compile at -Og >>> x86/irq: Make create_irq() compile at -Og >>> xen/efi: Make efi_start() compile at -Og >>> x86/shadow: Make _shadow_prealloc() compile at -Og >>> xen: Use -Og for debug builds when available >> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> >> >> I'd like to ask though that at least for the bogus warnings you >> amend the commit messages with the gcc version these were observed >> with. Perhaps even those seemingly bogus initializers would >> benefit from a very brief comment (or else there's a fair chance >> of them getting removed again at some point). > > I'm afraid I don't have that information easily to hand, but all issues > were found by distro-provided compilers included in our Gitlab > infrastructure.
Well, okay, then we'll need to live with said risk. As an aside I'd like to remind you though that on past occasions of working around compiler oddities, I was asked as well to provide compiler version information ... Jan
