LBR, C-state MSRs should correspond to Ice Lake desktop according to
SDM rev. 74 for both models.
Ice Lake-SP is known to expose IF_PSCHANGE_MC_NO in IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR
(as advisory tells and Whitley SDP confirms) which means the erratum is fixed
in hardware for that model and therefore it shouldn't be present in
has_if_pschange_mc list. Provisionally assume the same to be the case
for Ice Lake-D.
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhi...@citrix.com>
---
No changes in v5.
Changes in v4:
- now based on SDM update
- new LBR (0x1e0)does not seem to be exposed in the docs
Changes in v3:
- Add Ice Lake-D model numbers
- Drop has_if_pschange_mc hunk following Tiger Lake related discussion
---
xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c | 2 ++
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c
index c092086..d788c8b 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c
@@ -181,6 +181,8 @@ static void do_get_hw_residencies(void *arg)
case 0x55:
case 0x5E:
/* Ice Lake */
+ case 0x6A:
+ case 0x6C:
case 0x7D:
case 0x7E:
/* Tiger Lake */
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 30c6a57..91cba19 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -2990,7 +2990,7 @@ static const struct lbr_info *last_branch_msr_get(void)
/* Goldmont Plus */
case 0x7a:
/* Ice Lake */
- case 0x7d: case 0x7e:
+ case 0x6a: case 0x6c: case 0x7d: case 0x7e:
/* Tiger Lake */
case 0x8c: case 0x8d:
/* Tremont */
--
2.7.4
