There is a difference in generated code: xzalloc_bytes() forces SMP_CACHE_BYTES alignment. I think we not only don't need this here, but actually don't want it.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/optee.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/optee.c @@ -529,8 +529,7 @@ static struct optee_shm_buf *allocate_op while ( unlikely(old != atomic_cmpxchg(&ctx->optee_shm_buf_pages, old, new)) ); - optee_shm_buf = xzalloc_bytes(sizeof(struct optee_shm_buf) + - pages_cnt * sizeof(struct page *)); + optee_shm_buf = xzalloc_flex_struct(struct optee_shm_buf, pages, pages_cnt); if ( !optee_shm_buf ) { err_code = -ENOMEM;