On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 2:36 PM Stefano Stabellini
<sstabell...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2021, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:56 AM Stefano Stabellini
> > <sstabell...@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Rob,
> > >
> > > We have a question on the PCIe device tree bindings. In summary, we have
> > > come across the Raspberry Pi 4 PCIe description below:
> > >
> > >
> > > pcie0: pcie@7d500000 {
> > > compatible = "brcm,bcm2711-pcie";
> > > reg = <0x0 0x7d500000 0x0 0x9310>;
> > > device_type = "pci";
> > > #address-cells = <3>;
> > > #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > > #size-cells = <2>;
> > > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 148 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > > <GIC_SPI 148 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > interrupt-names = "pcie", "msi";
> > > interrupt-map-mask = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x7>;
> > > interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 &gicv2 GIC_SPI 143
> > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > msi-controller;
> > > msi-parent = <&pcie0>;
> > >
> > > ranges = <0x02000000 0x0 0xc0000000 0x6 0x00000000
> > > 0x0 0x40000000>;
> > > /*
> > > * The wrapper around the PCIe block has a bug
> > > * preventing it from accessing beyond the first 3GB of
> > > * memory.
> > > */
> > > dma-ranges = <0x02000000 0x0 0x00000000 0x0 0x00000000
> > > 0x0 0xc0000000>;
> > > brcm,enable-ssc;
> > >
> > > pci@1,0 {
> > > #address-cells = <3>;
> > > #size-cells = <2>;
> > > ranges;
> > >
> > > reg = <0 0 0 0 0>;
> > >
> > > usb@1,0 {
> > > reg = <0x10000 0 0 0 0>;
> > > resets = <&reset RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE_RESET_ID_USB>;
> > > };
> > > };
> > > };
> > >
> > >
> > > Xen fails to parse it with an error because it tries to remap reg =
> > > <0x10000 0 0 0 0> as if it was a CPU address and of course it fails.
> > >
> > > Reading the device tree description in details, I cannot tell if Xen has
> > > a bug: the ranges property under pci@1,0 means that pci@1,0 is treated
> > > like a default bus (not a PCI bus), hence, the children regs are
> > > translated using the ranges property of the parent (pcie@7d500000).
> > >
> > > Is it possible that the device tree is missing device_type =
> > > "pci" under pci@1,0? Or is it just implied because pci@1,0 is a child of
> > > pcie@7d500000?
> >
> > Indeed, it should have device_type. Linux (only recently due to
> > another missing device_type case) will also look at node name, but
> > only 'pcie'.
> >
> > We should be able to create (or extend pci-bus.yaml) a schema to catch
> > this case.
>
> Ah, that is what I needed to know, thank you! Is Linux considering a
> node named "pcie" as if it has device_type = "pci"?
Yes, it was added for Rockchip RK3399 to avoid a DT update and regression.
> In Xen, also to cover the RPi4 case, maybe I could add a check for the
> node name to be "pci" or "pcie" and if so Xen could assume device_type =
> "pci".
I assume this never worked for RPi4 (and Linux will have the same
issue), so can't we just update the DT in this case?
Rob
