On 04.12.2020 16:52, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 09:21 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >> The cpupool id is an unsigned value in the public interface header, >> so >> there is no reason why it is a signed value in struct cpupool. >> >> Switch it to unsigned int. >> > I think we can add: > > "No functional change intended" > >> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> >> > IAC: > > Reviewed-by: Dario Faggioli <dfaggi...@suse.com>
FAOD this applies without any further changes, i.e. not even my suggestion regarding the definition of CPUPOOLID_NONE to XEN_SYSCTL_CPUPOOL_PAR_ANY, or - not said explicitly in the earlier reply - at least the avoidance of open-coding UINT_MAX? Jan
