On 01.12.20 10:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 01.12.2020 09:21, Juergen Gross wrote:
Add /cpupool/<cpupool-id> directories to hypfs. Those are completely
dynamic, so the related hypfs access functions need to be implemented.

Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com>
---
V2:
- added const (Jan Beulich)

Any particular reason this doesn't extend to ...

@@ -1003,12 +1006,131 @@ static struct notifier_block cpu_nfb = {
      .notifier_call = cpu_callback
  };
+#ifdef CONFIG_HYPFS
+static const struct hypfs_entry *cpupool_pooldir_enter(
+    const struct hypfs_entry *entry);
+
+static struct hypfs_funcs cpupool_pooldir_funcs = {

... this (similarly in the next patch)? Granted I didn't look at
the hypfs patches yet, but I don't suppose these struct instances
need to be writable.

No reason. I'll add const.


Juergen

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to