On 20.11.2020 10:48, Paul Durrant wrote: > From: Paul Durrant <pdurr...@amazon.com> > > A previous patch introduced variants of the flush hypercalls that take a > 'Virtual Processor Set' as an argument rather than a simple 64-bit mask. > This patch introduces a similar variant of the HVCALL_SEND_IPI hypercall > (HVCALL_SEND_IPI_EX). > > NOTE: As with HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_SPACE/LIST_EX, a guest should > not yet issue the HVCALL_SEND_IPI_EX hypercall as support for > 'ExProcessorMasks' is not yet advertised via CPUID. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <pdurr...@amazon.com>
I guess most remarks given for the previous patch apply here as well. Jan
