On 19.11.2020 17:10, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 19/11/2020 15:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Found by looking for patterns similar to the one Julien did spot in
>> pci_vtd_quirks().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
>
> Subject is wonky. Is it P4 (Intel), or Fam15 (AMD) ? I'd be tempted to
> have the prefix as x86/nmi: either way.
With this code:
case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
switch (boot_cpu_data.x86) {
case 6:
setup_p6_watchdog((boot_cpu_data.x86_model < 14)
? P6_EVENT_CPU_CLOCKS_NOT_HALTED
: CORE_EVENT_CPU_CLOCKS_NOT_HALTED);
break;
case 15:
if (!setup_p4_watchdog())
I think qualifying it like I did is quite reasonable. Hence ...
> With that suitably adjusted, Acked-by: Andrew Cooper
> <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
... I'd prefer to keep it as is - please clarify.
Jan
