On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 03:51:18PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > The set of systems affected by XSA-345 would have been smaller is we had > this in place already: When the processor is capable of dealing with > mismatched cacheability, there's no extra work we need to carry out. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> I guess it's not worth using the alternative framework to patch this up at boot in order to avoid the call in the first place? Thanks, Roger.
