On Tuesday, September 8, 2020 11:04 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: > [...] > Personally I think this kind of a workaround patch is something > distros ought to be fine to carry, if they care about the > functionality and only until they get around to upgrade their > binutils. But I'll be happy to hear differing opinions.
Y'all just merged something to support building with make 3.81, released in *2006*, so why require a bleeding edge binutils to work with the executable image? > I also don't see any mention anywhere of why it's 32 bytes, and not > 16 or 64 or yet something else. It is 32 because you said 32 was probably fine. -- Trammell
