On 05.08.20 02:22, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Stefano
On Mon, 3 Aug 2020, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshche...@epam.com>
This patch makes possible to use device passthrough again.
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshche...@epam.com>
---
tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
index 620b499..4f748e3 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
@@ -9,6 +9,10 @@
#include <assert.h>
#include <xen/device_tree_defs.h>
+#define GUEST_VIRTIO_MMIO_BASE xen_mk_ullong(0x02000000)
+#define GUEST_VIRTIO_MMIO_SIZE xen_mk_ullong(0x200)
+#define GUEST_VIRTIO_MMIO_SPI 33
They should be in xen/include/public/arch-arm.h
ok
Is one interrupt enough if there are multiple virtio devices? Is it one
interrupt for all virtio devices, or one for each device?
One interrupt for each virtio device. I experimented with current
series and assigned 4 disk partitions to the guest. This resulted in 4
separate device-tree nodes, and each node had individual SPI and MMIO range.
Of course this patch should be folded in the patch to add virtio support
to libxl.
ok
--
Regards,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko
