On 07.07.2020 13:17, Michał Leszczyński wrote: > So would it be OK to use uint32_t everywhere and to store the trace buffer > size as number of kB? I think this is the most straightforward option. > > I would also stick with the name "processor_trace_buf_size" > everywhere, both in the hypervisor, ABI and the toolstack, with the > respective comments that the size is in kB.
Perhaps even more clearly "processor_trace_buf_kb" then? Jan
