On 29/06/2020 12:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.06.2020 12:03, Julien Grall wrote:
On 29/06/2020 09:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.06.2020 11:55, Julien Grall wrote:
As an aside, the padding sadly cannot be mandated to be 0 as they are
already present. So it is not going to be possible to use the padding
for extending a command in the future.
Why is the other adjustment fine to make due to still being tech
preview, but this one wouldn't be for the same reason?
This is mostly a left-over of the previous message. Although, I am not
really inclined to address this myself any time soon.
Sure, I didn't mean to indicate I might expect you to. But perhaps
here the wording could be slightly changed as well?
I am planning to remove the paragraph completely.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
