On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:00:38AM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roger Pau Monne <roger....@citrix.com>
> > Sent: 12 June 2020 16:57
> > To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> > Cc: p...@xen.org; Roger Pau Monne <roger....@citrix.com>; Jan Beulich 
> > <jbeul...@suse.com>; Andrew
> > Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; Wei Liu <w...@xen.org>
> > Subject: [PATCH for-4.14 1/8] x86/hvm: fix vIO-APIC build without 
> > IRQ0_SPECIAL_ROUTING
> > 
> > pit_channel0_enabled needs to be guarded with IRQ0_SPECIAL_ROUTING
> > since it's only used when the special handling of ISA IRQ 0 is enabled.
> > 
> > No functional change.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com>
> > ---
> >  xen/arch/x86/hvm/vioapic.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vioapic.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vioapic.c
> > index b87facb0e0..bd41036137 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vioapic.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vioapic.c
> > @@ -391,10 +391,12 @@ static void ioapic_inj_irq(
> >      vlapic_set_irq(target, vector, trig_mode);
> >  }
> > 
> > +#ifdef IRQ0_SPECIAL_ROUTING
> >  static inline int pit_channel0_enabled(void)
> >  {
> >      return pt_active(&current->domain->arch.vpit.pt0);
> >  }
> > +#endif
> 
> It's only called in two places. How about just manually inlining?

That would be fine, as I'm also removing one of the callers in a
following patch.

Thanks, Roger.

Reply via email to