On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:00:38AM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Roger Pau Monne <roger....@citrix.com> > > Sent: 12 June 2020 16:57 > > To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > > Cc: p...@xen.org; Roger Pau Monne <roger....@citrix.com>; Jan Beulich > > <jbeul...@suse.com>; Andrew > > Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; Wei Liu <w...@xen.org> > > Subject: [PATCH for-4.14 1/8] x86/hvm: fix vIO-APIC build without > > IRQ0_SPECIAL_ROUTING > > > > pit_channel0_enabled needs to be guarded with IRQ0_SPECIAL_ROUTING > > since it's only used when the special handling of ISA IRQ 0 is enabled. > > > > No functional change. > > > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> > > --- > > xen/arch/x86/hvm/vioapic.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vioapic.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vioapic.c > > index b87facb0e0..bd41036137 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vioapic.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vioapic.c > > @@ -391,10 +391,12 @@ static void ioapic_inj_irq( > > vlapic_set_irq(target, vector, trig_mode); > > } > > > > +#ifdef IRQ0_SPECIAL_ROUTING > > static inline int pit_channel0_enabled(void) > > { > > return pt_active(¤t->domain->arch.vpit.pt0); > > } > > +#endif > > It's only called in two places. How about just manually inlining?
That would be fine, as I'm also removing one of the callers in a following patch. Thanks, Roger.