On 30.04.2020 17:50, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 30/04/2020 12:09, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 30.04.2020 11:59, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/amd.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/amd.c >>> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ static bool_t verify_patch_size(uint32_t patch_size) >>> max_size = F16H_MPB_MAX_SIZE; >>> break; >>> case 0x17: >>> + case 0x19: >>> max_size = F17H_MPB_MAX_SIZE; >>> break; >> Didn't you indicate to me the other day that the upper bound would >> grow? > > That was a very non-specific patch to Linux. I've asked around, and the > answer seems to be 4800. > > Are you happy for your review to stand with adding a new > F19H_MPB_MAX_SIZE define to this effect?
Yes. Jan
