On 27.03.2020 19:50, Paul Durrant wrote: > This tools is analogous to 'xen-hvmctx' which presents HVM context. > Subsequent patches will add 'dump' functions when new records are > introduced. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <p...@xen.org> > --- > Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> > Cc: Wei Liu <w...@xen.org> > --- > .gitignore | 1 + > tools/misc/Makefile | 4 ++ > tools/misc/xen-ctx.c | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Is xen-ctx a good choice of a name, considering we already have not only xen-hvmctx, but also xenctx? If the new functionality isn't a good fit for either, perhaps its name would better reflect its connection to save/restore records? xen-sr-dump looks pretty clumsy to me, but still seems better than a name easily mixed up with others. Jan
