> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > Sent: 24 March 2020 09:39 > To: Paul Durrant <p...@xen.org> > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Andrew Cooper > <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; George Dunlap > <george.dun...@citrix.com>; Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>; Julien > Grall <jul...@xen.org>; > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>; Roger Pau Monné > <roger....@citrix.com>; Stefano > Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org>; Tim Deegan <t...@xen.org>; Wei Liu > <w...@xen.org> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] make sure PGC_extra pages are dealt with properly > > On 18.03.2020 18:32, Paul Durrant wrote: > > This series was formerly called "remove one more shared xenheap page: > > shared_info" but I have dropped the patches actually changing shared_info > > and just left the PGC_extra clean-up that was previously intertwined. > > > > Paul Durrant (3): > > mm: keep PGC_extra pages on a separate list > > x86 / ioreq: use a MEMF_no_refcount allocation for server pages... > > mm: add 'is_special_page' inline function... > > So I'm confused - I had just replied twice to v6 patch 5/5. This > series calls itself v4 and consists of the middle three patches > of what v6 was. What's the deal? Is this really v7, and the two > patches have been dropped / postponed?
Sorry, I clearly got confused with numbering against one of my other series. Yes, this should be v7. I wanted to send the patches that clear up use of PGC_extra, separating from the change to shared_info since I'm pressed for time to complete all the other conversions from xenheap pages such that I can send them as a single series. Paul > > Jan
