Hi Juergen,
On 26/02/2020 14:17, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 24.02.20 23:25, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 11/02/2020 09:31, Juergen Gross wrote:
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c
index 6f9bec22d3..30c4c1830b 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
#include <xen/iocap.h>
#include <xen/irq.h>
#include <xen/lib.h>
-#include <xen/livepatch.h>
#include <xen/mem_access.h>
#include <xen/mm.h>
#include <xen/param.h>
@@ -2239,11 +2238,6 @@ static void check_for_pcpu_work(void)
{
local_irq_enable();
do_softirq();
- /*
- * Must be the last one - as the IPI will trigger us to come
here
- * and we want to patch the hypervisor with almost no stack.
- */
- check_for_livepatch_work();
The check here was meant to match the x86 counterpart in
reset_stack_and_jump(). I suspect you also need to remove it.
Not really, as on x86 all relevant non-idle cases are being switched
to use reset_stack_and_jump_nolp().
Ah yes, I missed that bit. Thank you for the explanation!
Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgr...@amazon.com>
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
