> -----Original Message----- > From: Wei Liu <[email protected]> > Sent: 28 January 2020 16:54 > To: Durrant, Paul <[email protected]> > Cc: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>; Wei Liu <[email protected]>; Paul Durrant > <[email protected]>; Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>; Xen Development > List <[email protected]>; Roger Pau Monné > <[email protected]>; Wei Liu <[email protected]>; Michael Kelley > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 6/7] x86/hyperv: retrieve vp_index from > Hyper-V > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 04:33:00PM +0000, Durrant, Paul wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Xen-devel <[email protected]> On Behalf Of > Jan > > > Beulich > > > Sent: 28 January 2020 16:19 > > > To: Wei Liu <[email protected]>; Paul Durrant <[email protected]>; Andrew Cooper > > > <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Xen Development List <[email protected]>; Roger Pau > Monné > > > <[email protected]>; Wei Liu <[email protected]>; Michael Kelley > > > <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 6/7] x86/hyperv: retrieve vp_index > from > > > Hyper-V > > > > > > On 28.01.2020 16:55, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 04:48:38PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > >> On 22.01.2020 21:23, Wei Liu wrote: > > > >>> This will be useful when invoking hypercall that targets specific > > > >>> vcpu(s). > > > >>> > > > >>> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <[email protected]> > > > >>> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <[email protected]> > > > >> > > > >> For formal reasons > > > >> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> > > > >> > > > >> However I wonder whether the Viridian entry in MAINTAINERS > shouldn't > > > >> be extended by > > > >> > > > >> F: xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/ > > > >> > > > >> (and possibly have its title adjusted). Thoughts? > > > > > > > > This isn't about emulating Hyper-V inside Xen, so I don't think > that's > > > > the right approach here. > > > > > > Well, it's the code producing the interface in one case, and > > > consuming it here. So there is some overlap at least. > > > > > > > That said, if Paul wants to take this under his purview, it's fine > by me > > > > -- that would make me easier to upstream my patch. ;-) I also > wouldn't > > > > mind adding myself as maintainer for this path. > > > > > > Perhaps best both of you? Paul, Andrew, what do you think? > > > > > > > IMO it's probably best to the put the Hyper-V stuff under 'Viridian' > > and add yourself as a maintainer there. There really is likely to be > > significant overlap and it'd make it easier (for me at least) to keep > > track of the bigger picture (i.e. Xen using enlightenments as well as > > implementing them). > > When you said "yourself", did you mean me or Jan? >
You. I thought was replying to your question. Apologies for any confusion. Paul > Wei. > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Paul _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
