On 04.12.2019 17:02, Julien Grall wrote: > > > On 04/12/2019 15:59, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> >> >>> On Dec 4, 2019, at 10:55 AM, Julien Grall <jgr...@amazon.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Boris, >>> >>> On 28/11/2019 21:50, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>>> On 11/28/19 5:23 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 28.11.2019 10:38, Paul Durrant wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu.c >>>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu.c >>>>>> @@ -576,11 +576,36 @@ static void vpmu_arch_destroy(struct vcpu *v) >>>>>> vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->arch_vpmu_destroy(v); >>>>>> } >>>>>> + >>>>>> + vpmu_reset(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_ALLOCATED); >>>>>> } >>>>> Boris, to be on the safe side - are you in agreement with this >>>>> change, now that the setting of the flag is being left untouched? >>>> Yes, this is fine. >>> >>> Can we take this as an ACK? >> >> >> Yes, of course. > > Thank you! > > @Andrew, @Jan: this is x86 code, but I am happy to commit it if you prefer.
It has been committed already. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
