On 19.11.2019 11:23, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 19.11.2019 10:05, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: >> On 18.11.2019 16:09, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 18.11.2019 14:39, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: >>>> For this HVMOP_ALTP2M_INTERFACE_VERSION shout be increased. I will leave >>>> it to Tamas to decide if we will need a different structure for >>>> xen_hvm_altp2m_suppress_ve_multi to keep the compatibility. >>> >>> Wasn't is that due to the possible guest exposure it was decided >>> that the interface version approach was not suitable here, and hence >>> it shouldn't be bumped any further? >>> >> >> That is correct but there was also requested to add the new opaque field >> so I don't know how to have that an still keep the same version. > > New sub-op? >
Wouldn't it be simpler to have a new structure to use for this, something like "struct xen_hvm_altp2m_suppress_ve_multi" and then the version will be unchanged Alex _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
