On 13.10.2019 00:11, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > @@ -1099,9 +1096,6 @@ static void __init efi_exit_boot(EFI_HANDLE > ImageHandle, EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *Syste > > /* Adjust pointers into EFI. */ > efi_ct = (void *)efi_ct + DIRECTMAP_VIRT_START; > -#ifdef USE_SET_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_MAP > - efi_rs = (void *)efi_rs + DIRECTMAP_VIRT_START; > -#endif
This doesn't get re-instated in any way by patch 2. How come you get away without? In any event this is perhaps the best example of why I personally think it would have been better to change things in place, rather than remove everything first. But for some of the other change the question also arises of why they don't need re-instating in one form or another. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
