On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 17:34, Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> Jürgen Groß writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [XEN PATCH for-4.13 v2 9/9] libxl/xl:
> Overhaul passthrough setting logic"):
> > On 11.10.19 15:31, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > I do not have a strong opinion about this. I would be happy with
> > > "auto" (or "default" maybe).
> >
> > "unspecified"?
>
> That is IMO the best suggestion so far so I will go with that in my
> v3.
Seems odd to specify a parameter with a value of 'unspecified' ;-)
Paul
>
> Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
